Mission & Pitfalls: Words from the Holy Father

Mission & Pitfalls: Words from the Holy Father

We’d like to call our readers’ attention to some remarks made today by Pope Francis at St. John Lateran in Rome.

Reflecting upon some passages from Acts and the Gospels of Mark and Luke, as well as points made in Evangelii Gaudium, the Holy Father outlined the nature of mission work in the Church, as well as some of the primary errors to be avoided in such work.

The message was offered for the Pontifical Mission Society, but perhaps it holds some valuable advice for those who wish to promote evangelization, whether in a specific area of mission, or across the Church in their area, and can help identify attitudes that do not in the end serve the missionary purpose of the Church.

Vatican News provides a summary of the remarks here, and the complete text may be read here.

Below are some excerpts from Francis’ text.

We ask that readers continue to pray for the Holy Father, bishops and for the special needs of our diocese during this week in which we remember Christ’s Ascension.

______________________________________________________________________________

Pitfalls to avoid:

“Self-absorption.  Church organizations and agencies, quite apart from the good intentions of their individual members, sometimes end up turning in on themselves, devoting energy and attention primarily to promoting themselves and to advertising their own initiatives.  Some seem to be dominated by an obsession to continually redefine their own importance and their own bailiwicks within the Church, under the guise of relaunching their specific mission.  In this way, as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger once said, they can foster the misleading idea that a person is somehow more Christian if he or she is occupied with intra-ecclesial structures, whereas in reality nearly all the baptized are daily living lives of faith, hope, and charity, without ever participating in Church committees or concerned for the latest news about ecclesiastical politics (cf. Una compagnia sempre riformanda, Speech at the IX Meeting in Rimini, 1 September 1990).”

Control anxiety.  Institutions and agencies sometimes set out to help ecclesial communities by employing the gifts generated in them by the Holy Spirit, yet over time they presume to exercise supremacy and control over the very communities they are meant to serve.  This attitude is almost always accompanied by the claim that they are exercising the role of “overseers” called to determine the legitimacy of other groups.  They end up acting as if the Church was a product of our own calculations, plans, agreements and decisions.”

Elitism.  An elitist feeling, the unspoken notion of belonging to an aristocracy, takes hold at times among those who are part of groups and organized institutions in the Church: a superior class of specialists who strive to increase their own influence in collusion or in competition with other ecclesiastical elites, and train their members according to secular notions of activism or technical-professional competence . . .”

“Isolation from the people.  The elitist temptation in some organizations connected to the Church can be accompanied at times by a sentiment of superiority and of intolerance towards the rest of the baptized, towards the people of God who may attend parishes and visit shrines, but are not “activists” busy in Catholic organizations.  The People of God is viewed as an inert mass, always in need of being awakened and mobilized through a “consciousness-raising” consisting in arguments, appeals and teachings.  As if the certainty of faith was the consequence of persuasive speech or training methods.”

Abstraction.  Once they become self-absorbed, institutions and entities connected to the Church lose contact with reality and fall prey to abstraction.  They needlessly multiply instances of strategic planning in order to produce projects and guidelines that serve only as means of self-promotion for those who come up with them.  They take problems and dissect them in intellectual laboratories where everything has been domesticated and is viewed through the lens of their own ideology.  Everything, even references to the faith or verbal appeals to Jesus and the Holy Spirit, once taken outside of their proper context, can thus end up rigidified and unreal.”

Functionalism.  Self-absorbed and elitist organizations, even within the Church, often end up staking everything on the imitation of secular models of worldly efficiency, like those rooted in competition, whether economic or social.  Opting for functionalism gives the illusion of being able to “sort matters out” in a balanced way, keeping things under control, maximizing one’s own relevance, and improving the everyday management of existing structures.  However, as I already said to you at our 2016 meeting, a Church afraid of entrusting herself to the grace of Christ and focusing on the efficiency of its bureaucracy is already dead, even if structures and programmes that favour the interest of “self-absorbed” clergy or lay people linger for centuries.”

Further considerations:

Proximity to life “in progress”  Jesus met his first disciples on the shore of the Sea of Galilee while they were focused on their work.  He did not meet them at a convention, a training workshop, or in the Temple.  It has always been the case that the proclamation of Jesus’ salvation reaches people right where they are and just how they are in the midst of their lives in progress.  Amid the needs, hopes and problems of everyday life we find the place where one who has acknowledged the love of Christ and received the gift of the Holy Spirit can offer an account of his or her faith, hope, and charity to those who ask for it.  By journeying together with others, alongside everyone.  Especially given the times in which we live, this has nothing to do with designing “specialized” training programmes, creating parallel worlds, or constructing “slogans” that merely echo our own thoughts and concerns. ”

A free gift, not the result of strategies: “All of us are called to nurture by means of love and gratitude, as well as by our works, the seeds of divine life that the Spirit of Christ causes to blossom and grow where he wills, even in the deserts.  Please, in your prayer ask above all that the Lord make everyone better prepared to recognize the signs of his activity, in order then to reveal them to the whole world.  Even this can be helpful: to ask that, in the depths of our own hearts, our prayer to the Holy Spirit may not be reduced to a mere formality in our meetings and homilies.  It is not helpful to theorize about super-strategies or mission “core guidelines” as a means of reviving missionary spirit or giving missionary patents to others.  If, in some cases, missionary fervour is fading, it is a sign that faith itself is fading.  In such cases, the attempt to revive the flame by strategies and speeches will end up only weakening it all the more, causing the desert to expand. “

The “sensus fidei” of the People of God.  There is one reality in the world that has a kind of “feel” for the Holy Spirit and his workings.  It is the People of God, called and loved by Jesus, who for their part continue to seek him amid the difficulties of their lives.  The People of God beg for the gift of his Spirit: entrusting their expectation to the simple words of their prayers and never entertaining the presumption of their own self-sufficiency.  The holy People of God are gathered together and anointed by the Lord…. The working of the Holy Spirit equips the faithful People with an “instinct” of faith, the sensus fidei, which helps them not to err when believing the things of God, even if they do not know the theological arguments and formulas that define the gifts they experience.  The mystery of the pilgrim people, who with their popular piety travel to shrines and entrust themselves to Jesus, Mary and the saints, draws from this and shows that it is connatural to the free and gratuitous initiative of God, apart from our pastoral planning.”

Mission springs from the gratitude of having met Christ, having been drawn and attracted by Him: ” If one follows Jesus, happy to be attracted by him, others will take notice.  They may even be astonished.  The joy that radiates from those attracted by Christ and by his Spirit is what can make any missionary initiative fruitful.”


59 Replies to “Mission & Pitfalls: Words from the Holy Father”

  1. A gentle reminder that, while we appreciate that our readers have concerns on many issues, discussion should remain primarily on the topic of the post. Please visit our post on the COVID decree if you wish to discuss that issue.

    2
    1. Thank you Red Wolf. I was a little disappointed to see this most important post being hijacked by Covid-19 discussion (which there is still opportunity to do so on said previous post). I worry we are being distracted (either by our own means or on purpose by others trying to distract from this) by other things that will be resolved and go away (the virus) when we need to focus on expressing concern about “the big plan” on which our Chancery has repeatedly stated it will not change course. Regardless, I pose my question again, I wonder if there has not been much response to Pope Francis’ words quoted above (especially in opposition to) because if one argues against it they show themselves amongst one of the above stated categories? Is there anything stated above that can support UiH OR even Amazing Parish or Alpha, etc? I I’d really like to see discussion about it. Does anyone disagree with Pope Francis’ words stated above, and if so how and why? Or do we all agree? If we all agree then why is this plan still in motion and not being reworked?

      2
      1. One last thing to back up the fact that this plan is more concerning than the current virus as Pope Francis state’d, “…a Church afraid of entrusting herself to the grace of Christ and focusing on the efficiency of its bureaucracy is already dead, even if structures and programmes that favour the interest of “self-absorbed” clergy or lay people linger for centuries.” That’s what I’m afraid of….

        4
      2. I do believe it is a deliberate distraction, appealing to emotionalism disconnected from thought. A shrewd assessment of one’s audience on the part of those aiming to distract. I wonder how many of the posters agitated about Covid-19 have read the words of Pope Francis under which they were posting. Maybe it’s not too late.
        How can anyone disagree with this statement by L.O. above:” Does anyone disagree with Pope Francis’ words stated above, and if so how and why? Or do we all agree? If we all agree then why is this plan still in motion and not being reworked? “

        1
  2. Ellie R, Cathy, LRK, Holly, Anonymous – Lets stop the charade. Remaining anonymous is one thing, pretending to be several different anonymous posters to back up your claims is something entirely different. Choose an anonymous identity and stick with it.

    1
  3. Also, I have not seen a single post on TheRedWolfReport criticizing the response of our priests to the Covid-19 situation, or any priest being berated for following the bishop’s guidelines. This is another indication that those panicked by Covid-19 are living in a fantasy world. Possibly, they have heard people complain against their priests in private conversation. But that hardly justifies blanket accusations against those who oppose the guidelines issued by the bishop. If charity is lacking on either side of this controversy, it seems to be most lacking on the side of those who take the side that Covid-19 is a terrible threat.

    2
    1. Did you read the post all the way through? The post regarding the criticism of our priests had nothing to do with posts on Red Wolf. That staff member was sharing their own experiences. Perhaps they were simply trying to offer an inside perspective. Why do you feel a need to discredit that? Just because you have not seen something yourself does not mean it is not true or that others are not suffering as a result. Might I also add that I have re-read that post several times and it appears the individual wasn’t even taking a side in regards to the COVID-19 regulations. We get you don’t think COVID-19 is a threat, that’s your prerogative, but there is no need to attack every single writer who’s post is not in direct opposition to the Bishop or clergy.

      3
      1. If the parish staff member, in her letter accusing unnamed persons of harassing priests, telling them that they are “lesser priests,” asking them to rebel against their vows of obedience, accusing them of not being truly committed to the faith”—”has nothing to do with posts on Red Wolf, “– then why on earth did she post it on RedWolfReport? The accusations she makes are pretty serious, and therefore she has no right to generalize them. And posting these accusations on the RedWolfReport is generalizing them. It suggests that those opposed to the bishop’s guidelines are like the people she is excoriating. In fact, she addresses the readers and contributors of the RedWolfReport directly: “Stop asking him [your priest] to bend the rules! Stop asking him to rebel and then suggesting that because he is doing what he has been told that he is a lesser priest or not truly committed to the faith.” If she had no intention of generalizing her accusations, she should have simply said these same things in private to the parishioners who were behaving in this way.

        1
        1. What did you expect he/she to do, list the priest’s name and the individuals doing the harassing? How would that benefit the priest? I don’t think the post was targeted towards all people that disagree with the safety regulations. They also did not attempt to convey that EVERYONE who disagrees is acting in this way. The post was literally just offering a reminder to not take anger out on those that don’t deserve it which is our priests. You’re taking a post from someone trying to advocate for our priests and trying to find a reason to get offended by it. If you are not one of those doing the harassing then don’t get offended. The only thing you should be offended by perhaps is that there are potentially priests being mistreated because of decisions they did not personally make.

          3
          1. What you mean to say is “What did you expect ME to do”. It is offensive you are trying to play games and back up your own claims as multiple people. How can anyone believe anything you say now?

            2
          2. Say, this is sort of fun. I assure you I am only one person posting, and only posting as PMH. On the other hand, could it be……? Could I be dialoguing with “Disgruntled Catholic” himself? Dialogue is great, dialogue is good, dialogue is endless. However, I will still end this, especially since I agree that this particular Red Wolf article is not the one to be having this conversation on. And the topic of this article, Pope Francis’s admonitions, are very important. He warns against those who “needlessly multiply instances of strategic planning in order to produce projects and guidelines that serve only as means of self-promotion for those who come up with them. They take problems and dissect them in intellectual laboratories where everything has been domesticated and is viewed through the lens of their own ideology. Everything, even references to the faith or verbal appeals to Jesus and the Holy Spirit, once taken outside of their proper context, can thus end up rigidified and unreal.” Pope Francis’s own words that seem to apply to Uniting in Heart. And that is the topic of this particular Red Wolf article.

            3
      2. I sTated at the end of my post WHAT I EXPECTED THE PARISH STAFF MEMBER TO DO: if she was not accusing others who oppose the bishop’s guidelines of the nasty behavior toward priests that she lists, SHE SHOULD NOT HAVE POSTED IT ON THEREDWOLFREPORT. Posting and addressing the readers of TheRedWolfReport directly to “STOP ASKING [YOUR PRIEST] TO BEND THE RULES1 STOP ASKING HIM TO REBEL AND THEN SUGGESTING THAT BECAUSE HE IS DOING WHAT HE HAS BEEN TOLD THAT HE IS A LESSER PRIEST OR NOT TRULY COMMITTED TO THE FAITH” IS ACCUSING THEM OF THESE VERY THINGS. Telling people (in this case the readers of TheRedWolfReport) to STOP DOING SOMETHING IS ACCUSING THEM OF DOING THAT SOMETHING.

        1
  4. Covid-19 extends its hysterical tentacles into the totally separate resistance to Uniting- in-Heart. The article “Mission and Pitfalls” on the Red Wolf Report, which demolished the rationale behind Uniting-in-Heart, USING THE WORDS OF POPE FRANCIS, has been completely hijacked by emotional people, unaware that COVID-19 HAS SO FAR KILLED ONLY 301 PEOPLE PER MILLION PEOPLE IN THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES. It makes one wonder how the poster who wrote “those of us in the medical field watching people die alone from this disease every day” could possibly be living on this planet. I rather doubt that this person has watched even one person die of Covid-19, and certainly not alone, or he or she would not have been watching.

    3
    1. Goodness, PMH. You are taking it a little far… imagine if you are wrong how hurtful your words would be to that individual. “Alone” can have varying meanings, perhaps they meant they watched patients die without family members or perhaps the healthcare worker was standing outside the room. I don’t know. But I do know several nurses within my own parish that have been on the frontlines and I would never have the audacity to question their experiences since I have not personally been in that situation. Let us not make assumptions that could hurt others.

      1
      1. PMH is not wrong. You have claimed to be several people, including a health care professional, a parish worker, and also not a healthcare professional. We all see through your games.

        2
  5. Might I simply suggest that while we’re in the business of writing petitions to be sent to the Bishop we might also start one in opposition of Uniting in Heart? I’ll be happy to identify my own parish position and family name on the petition but it would probably do better if it was associated with others members of this diocese. What do you folks think?

    1
  6. Thank you Holly for a very beautifully written post. I pray we leave enough room in our hearts to consider the opinions of others without hate or judgment.

    1
    1. Holly and others want to perpetuate irrational fear and ignorance. How is that charitable to others? The Surgeon General told people to stop buying masks weeks ago. Dr. Fauci is on record (60 minutes) saying there is no need to wear them in public. Forcing masks during mass at this point is just an exercise in softening the target for even more directives inbound with the rollout of UiH. Fortunately, those with eyes open have already carefully redirected their tithes. Regardless, I continue to pray for our clergy, and yes, even our bishop.

      3
      1. I don’t agree with some of the opinions shared but let’s also consider the fact that everyone has a reason for feeling how they do about safety regulations. I do have two dear friends that have lost family members to this virus. These people would certainly feel differently about the level of threat COVID-19 poses than those who have not been directly affected. Let us remember that we don’t know everyone’s story/background/reasoning and have respect for all. At our core, are we not all Catholics trying to serve God the best that we are able?

        1
  7. As a member of parish staff, I feel called to say this….
    I have seen my own pastor being harassed by parishioners angry with him because he is following the rules laid out to him by the Bishop. Let us all keep in mind that our priests have taken a vow of obedience and they did not make these safety regulations! Stop requesting private Masses! Stop asking him to bend the rules! Stop asking him to rebel and then suggesting that because he is doing what he has been told that he is a lesser priest or not truly committed to the faith. I have been shocked and deeply saddened the way I have seen parishioners use this difficult time as an opportunity to bully our priests into getting what they want. I have been shocked by the hateful emails I’ve been copied on trying to get others to gang up on our priests regarding rules that are out of their hands. I understand why people are angry but I beg of you to keep things in perspective and not take your anger out on people that don’t deserve it. Our priests certainly do not. Please think before you send that nasty email or write that nasty post. Consider those that are simply doing their best. If you don’t like it, there are plenty of other Catholic churches in Indiana.

    5
    1. I agree with the person claiming to be a parish staff person. Aside from a few extreme circumstances, diocesan clergy are bound to a vow of obedience to their bishop—whether they think the bishop’s decisions are good or bad. Diocesan priests are essentially beasts of burden that are to complete their duties at the will of the bishop. This all falls on his lap. Many of us close to the situation (closer than he may realize) are disappointed and monitoring closely.

      3
      1. Well said Anon. Let us have compassion for our priests during this time. I’m so discouraged by some of the parishioners of my own Church who have taken to public Facebook pages, forums ext. to shame and ridicule our priests who are doing their best to follow the Bishops orders while still abiding by their parishioners needs. One woman from our parish even suggested that our pastor should re-discern his call to the priesthood because he opted to obey the regulation that requires Communion at the end of the Mass to account for social distancing. This poor man has been a priest his entire adult life and my heart hurts so badly thinking about how these cruel and public accusations must affect his mental health. Let us all try our best to pray and advocate for our dear priests during this time.

        1
      2. I agree with the person claiming to be parish staff as well. I have not personally witnessed any such abuse of priests nor heard of any from the priests or parish staff I have spoken with, but any such ire is misdirected. The blame for this mismanagement and poor priorities belongs with the Bishop and those in power at the chancery.

        1
  8. I read an excellent explanation given to his parishioners by a priest in Southern Indiana to all of the guidelines that no one likes. He said he wanted to protect all of his parishioners and at this point, that means being obedient to the guidelines given. He said we are protecting each other and that the last thing the parish would want was to be closed again. He asked that anyone who tested positive during this time of reopening the churches to notify the parish and that if HE tested positive, the parish would have to be shut down. For this reason, he was asking everyone to do these thing for the sake of the other people. And isn’t that what being Christian is all about? It’s not about our personal likes and dislikes and opinions. We Americans are so sure that we are always right if we disagree with someone. Doing in MY way. No. It’s about being charitable and obedient. In talking to several religious and priests, not in the diocese, they have reminded me that obedience to what you don’t like is an occasion for holiness. Perhaps it’s time for the RedWolfers to step back and consider that. Our priests are being obedient. Let’s support them. God has our back, he will reward us for this time of trial. HIS Church has given us these dispensations. We have to pack away our pride and be obedient. And, if you desire Confession, churches in Indy are open and confessions are being heard. You don’t have to drive to Dover, IN. Just do some research and find a parish in Indpls. I noticed that several on that petition have ready access. Let’s be charitable, put on the masks for each other.

    2
    1. The “RedWolfers” as you refer to be those who read and comment here, are by no means monolithic. I don’t care if the bishop requires masks, as long as access to the sacraments is opened speedily to the greatest number of people in the most convenient way. Masks are an inconvenience whose utility in preventing the spread has been the subject of changing advice from the so called experts, but they are just that- an inconvenience. If wearing masks gets us Mass and confession quicker, then I’ll gladly acquiesce to it. Sadly, it appears that masks are just one in a lengthy, onerous list of requirements that will have the overall effect of restricting access to sacraments. Again, the pattern of valuing health of the body over health of the soul. And based on the data that is now available, this virus is nowhere NEARLY as deadly as was supposed when the whole country went into lockdown panic mode… not even close. It’s very bad for old people, so it’s good to protect them. I think there are prudent ways to do that AND still minister to everyone’s souls.

      3
    2. Dear JFW,

      “ Imagine if our founding fathers had given up on liberty due to a 1% chance they might die.”

      2
    3. I agree with JFW. There are many places around our nation where churches are not even opened. The governor has trusted those in charge of organizing religious events in this state to do the right thing and do so safely. We should be grateful we are even allowed to return to Mass, as so many are not. Just because some people are mad about the safety regulations does not mean everyone is. For some, especially the vulnerable, the safety regulations will help them to feel comfortable enough to go to Mass.

      3
      1. To the person above, I would hardly call concerns regarding the pandemic “irrational”. In fact, this is kind of a slap in the face to those of us in the medical field watching people die alone from this disease every day and working hard to stop it. Let us have some respect for those of us that have decided to take a global health crisis seriously and abide by practical safety regulations….

        5
        1. Irrational fear. I stand by what I posted. If you’re in the medical field you know the masks people are wearing are ineffective. Besides, this far into the event, surgical masks (check the FDA review of surgical masks) in public are a joke. Stop playing into ignorance. If you’re not comfortable, stay home. Our bishop is not only insulting our intelligence by requiring masks in public, he is not even respecting Christ by pulling a bait and switch—now only allowing Communion in the hand.

          2
          1. If I might humbly offer my own personal opinion on this matter:
            I’m not a healthcare professional but I am able to understand that one wears a mask not for themselves but for those around them they may come in contact with. The countries that have utilized face masks in public flattened the curve faster, particularly in Asia. Keep in mind that a single cough can release as many as 3,000 droplets into the air. Not to mention that studies show droplets can be transferred also via simply speaking. Consider, if you will, if a non-mask wearing person was unsystematic but carried COVID-19. What if they coughed or sneezed in church while in close proximity to a person who was elderly or perhaps someone with a compromised immune system? Would you not agree that the vulnerable person would face a decreased risk of contracting the virus if the infected individual had been wearing a mask?

            I’m not here to debate the use of masks, I know that’s not really what this platform is for. However, if we could do ANYTHING, even as simple as wearing a mask, to protect those in our parish whom we love wouldn’t we do it? I’m not going to argue that masks are 100% effective, we know this is not the case. But if you can at least agree that there is a POSSIBILITY they could help protect vulnerable members of the community why wouldn’t you wear one?

            I will be wearing a mask at Mass not for myself but because I can’t bear the thought of not having done everything I possibly can to protect those I care about.

            5
  9. Incredible post. I agree with the above comments. This might be the most important post yet. Don’t stop, Red Wolf!! Keep it coming!

    5
  10. BISHOP DOHERTY. FR. DUDZINSKI. READ THIS POST (OR WHOEVER IS KEEPING THEM AWARE OF THIS “AMUSING LITTLE EPISODE IN THE LAITY DELUDING THEMSELVES INTO THINKING THEY ACTUALLY CONTROL THE GOVERNANCE OF THE CHURCH”- SEND THIS MESSAGE TO THEM. The Holy Father has given you a “plan”- one that doesn’t look anything like Uniting In Heart. Our Holy Father wants more for us, his people. Will you listen to him? Will you listen to us?!

    11
  11. This is perhaps the most important article published by TheRedWolfReport. It may, however, not be receiving enough attention, as measured by comments, because people do not realize its game-changing nature. It is clear, forthright, and to the point. Perhaps this paragraph from Pope Francis’s speech, given on May 21, 2020, sums up the reason for our opposition to the Uniting in Heart and Amazing Parish programs:
    “Abstraction. Once they become self-absorbed, institutions and entities connected to the Church lose contact with reality and fall prey to abstraction. They needlessly multiply instances of strategic planning in order to produce projects and guidelines that serve only as means of self-promotion for those who come up with them. They take problems and dissect them in intellectual laboratories where everything has been domesticated and is viewed through the lens of their own ideology. Everything, even references to the faith or verbal appeals to Jesus and the Holy Spirit, once taken outside of their proper context, can thus end up rigidified and unreal.”

    13
    1. 100% agree with PMH. THIS POST IS HUGE. Each one of these paragraphs is a bombshell that seems to be written with Uniting in Heart in mind. We will see if “Disgruntled Catholic” and others touting the hierarchical nature of the Church will heed the Holy Father’s words. I had started to pick out salient quotes from among RW’s post, but it’s impossible. They’re all dead on.
      I HOPE EVERYONE WHO IS PARTICIPATING WILL READ AND REREAD THE QUOTES IN THE POST ABOVE.

      Do NOT give up hope. Pray, pray pray that the Bishop, the Vicar General, and all those involved in Uniting In Heart will take Pope Francis’ words to heart.

      13
    2. Amen. This post is THE POST. I personally love that it comes from the Chair of Peter. I wonder if there are not as many comments because there is nothing more to say, ie One cannot argue against this post, and if one does, they would reveal that they fall into one of the categories Our Holy Father mentions above? Thoughts?

      7
  12. A petition is making it’s rounds imploring the Bishop to open the churches and chapels for private prayer, allow confessions before the Eucharist, and a few other things.

    If you feel inclined, you can read the petition here:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/191_Orh6EYNbRWktqwWxj6Ot0bBt5_y2DzgK7_xvLk1Y/edit?usp=sharing

    If you feel inclined to sign the petition. It may be signed here:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O5fvRRpXKh1Qzq3ktTNzchPSelsOmaZ8bnOg46rSTLk/edit?usp=sharing

    The petition will be sent on May 26th. It looks like the petition was created by 7 different families all from different parishes across the diocese.

    8
    1. Okay I can of course understand the desire for Adoration and Confessions ASAP but in regards to this petition, the CDC recommends wearing a mask in places of large gatherings, as do government officials. It seems that wearing a mask in church for the few weeks that it is required of us is such a small, simple thing to do out of respect for the vulnerable of our community. In what way does this truly inconvenience us? This is a ridiculous thing to complain about in the midst of all else that is going on.

      4
    2. You all need to prayerfully reconsider this petition. Is this really what our focus should be on right now? Consider what you are petitioning. You are complaining about regulations put into place to PROTECT you and your parish from a virus that has killed over 300,000 people. You are complaining about having to wear a mask. These regulations are only in place for a few weeks. I don’t agree with our Bishop in many manners and certainly not Uniting in Heart but this petition is embarrassing. I’m ashamed there are people from my own parish that have signed it.

      4
      1. Why are the people who believe everything that is claimed about the Covid-19 virus so eager to shame those who have a different opinion? It is a perfectly reasonable wish to have confession available before going to Holy Communion. Other dioceses are allowing it. I know two people who recently drove all the way to Dover, Indiana, about a two hour drive, to go to confession. The fact that 300,000 thousand people have died from this virus sounds frightening. I assume this is world-wide. Giving the number of deaths without context seems manipulative. United States, deaths so far are 97,000. That equals 296 deaths per million people in the population. And as to masks, other dioceses are not making them mandatory for Mass attendance. The fact is that we have to take chances in life, even chances that affect other people. And we decide what chances to take by balancing likely outcomes. Simply trying to shame other people who balance these chances differently is not fair.

        7
        1. How can you ignore the blatant truth though when it is right in front of you? How can you ignore professionals who know far more than we do regarding the transmission of the virus? Minimizing COVID-19 is what caused it to get so out of hand in the first place. If people don’t like the regulations here then just go to a different diocese. I don’t like the Bishop either but come on… it’s not like he created the coronavirus and it is not fair to blame him for his reaction based upon the information he has been provided by government officials. It seems to me that people are angry with him regarding other matters and just using this as a reason to cause further division.

          3
          1. “AS I PASS through my incarnations in every age and race,
            I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Safety Place.
            Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
            And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all…..

          2. As to experts, they first said don’t wear a mask..then they said wear a mask. They initially though millions would die then hundreds of thousands in the US ( a factor which INCLUDED SOCIAL DISTANCING being practiced) and we didn’t each that. Now even Dr Fauci is admitting that if the lock down goes on too long it could be harmful. They said COVID could live for days on objects, now they think objects play a lesser role in transfer.

            All in all , its a novel virus, so hey we are all learning…..but the experts have been wrong enough that one could still prudently disagree as to the best answer…mask or no mask.

            But a few things need to be said. The mission of the Church is to save souls, not to prolong earthly lives, not to balance a budget etc. Programs such as UIH run the risk of letting the method, ostensibly for the preaching of the Gospel, get in the way of the ultimate goal… as one can observe from the Pope Francis quotes.

            As for petitions, the faithful have a right to make there concerns known to the sacred pastors. Both the petition and this site are excellent examples of how to do this with a good deal of restraint.

            As to the balancing COVID risks and access to the sacraments. Hmmm. How to put this bluntly you, your children, your parents, all your grandparents, all the babies, all the old people..the immuno-suppressed people you know…..er well they are all some day going to die, just like all the parish buildings we love may some day be replaced. The mission of the Church, saving souls, is principally by preaching the Gospel and administering the sacraments to the faithful. Just as bodies die without food, if we do not eat His Body and drink His Blood, we have NO life within us. If we die in a state of mortal sin, save God GIVES us the grace of perfect contrition ( no, you cannot just drum up perfect contrition or wish hard enough for it) we will end up in Hell. If we receive Holy Communion with being in a state of grace…we eat and drink damnation unto ourselves…thus the ordering of the sacraments is very relevant.

            But to tie this all back together, while God does not need the sacraments, the faithful do. They need them more than pastoral plannings and balanced diocesan budgets…. but really they need them more than their own physical life.

            A Church which is overly concerned with implementation of new plans, or even with trying to practice good epidemiology is ultimately not doing the work of Christ.

            While we should be charitable in our criticisms of the hierarchy..in making our concerns known, both about UIH and access to sacraments, and while we should take some precautions against illness….it does best to remember the two great commandments and the order in which they are given.

            You shall live the Lord your God with your whole heart, your whole soul and you whole strength and FOR HIS SAKE, you shall love your neighbor as yourself.

            Without access to sacraments, neither laity nor the clergy will act with prudence in administration of the temporal governance of the Church orin attempts to practice authentic christian charity in caring for/protecting the vulnerable. Less still shall we convert anybody. Without the sacraments….faith hope and charity weaken and die within us…. an neither we nor our parishes will be amazing, or even healthy. The love for the sacraments and the parishes (the places where we received them) are natural and wholesome expressions of piety. Any vision which minimizes these or sees them as selfish of sinful is, I would argue, not seeing things rightly, and thus….. in spite of all good intentions.. shall not bear the good fruit which we must in charity assume the initiators of UIH (and recently the more health focused) intended and desire.

            5
        2. Consider those that are pregnant or perhaps those that have gone through chemotherapy or are otherwise vulnerable. We all know at least one person in this category. They should be able to safely attend Mass knowing every precaution has been taken to ensure their health. No, this is not ideal and we don’t all have to agree but can’t we just suck it up for a few weeks for their sake?

          4
    3. Nope, sorry. Can’t hop on board this one. I wonder how many people actually read what the petition is for before signing this document.

      “You shall love your neighbor as yourself. Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.” – Romans 13:10

      5
      1. I would urge people who do not agree with the petition to the bishop, asking for the opportunity for confession before Communion and for the optional wearing of masks—TO NOT SIGN THE PEITITION. Rather than attacking the charity or virtue of those who do agree with the petition. One of the really disturbing things about the Covid-19 panic is the demonization of people who have a different approach to it. And the denial of their freedom of expression.

        3
    4. I almost signed the petition until I read the part about the face mask needing to be optional. This is such a petty thing to argue about especially given the fact that it will likely only be required for a couple weeks. So you have to wear one for maybe a few Masses and then you get to your car and take it off. I’m confused why people are angry about this?

      1
      1. I would argue that we have now not had access to the sacraments for 2 months, and there is no guarantee the mask precaution will be only a few weeks. The faithful have not only “sucked it up” for now two months they have born the disruption of the UIH roll-out, the loss of the sacraments during the holiest season of the year, and they are only now being admitted back with none to few strictures. Indeed as the psalms say …… we have had tears for bread an an abundance of tears for our drink. As you would have the people beartiral in patience for the sick and vulnerable… in patience understand that to many the loss of access to sacraments is a profound harm.

        5
        1. I agree to some extent with the anonymous writer from above as well as to some extent with Doc. We all know our loved ones will die someday and we don’t really have much control at all over the matter. We also know we need our Sacraments back as soon as possible. However, is it not also important that as we return to Mass we do so as safely as possible out of love for one another? Does God not call us also to value and protect human life? I don’t think you need to agree with government officials, health officials, research or even the Bishop to also rationally see why it is important to practice caution at this time– at least to some degree. I’m not trying to disrespect anyone’s opinion and can understand both sides but this is a complicated issue.

          3

Leave a Reply

GUIDELINES FOR POSTING

1. No personal attacks against other posters.
2. No spamming comments.
3. Restrict comments to the topic of the post.
4. Pray, then post, as discussed before.

Your email address will not be published.