Diocesan Update
Yesterday, the diocese published a notice from the bishop advising of the decision to postpone new clergy assignments until mid-August. The statement is quoted in full here, and may also be viewed on the diocesan website:
April 27, 2020
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
We think deeply about our Church these days. The distancing and the sheltering (or lack of it) raise thoughts about the Church as an institution. Let’s remind ourselves that we did not make the institution, but that the Holy Spirit made and remakes it, the Church.
Austen Ivereigh sent Pope Francis some questions which he responded to in late March. The Pope reminds his interviewer that the pandemic is not the sole source of disorder. In the life of the Church, the Holy Spirit provokes disorder by a rich scattering of charisms, and then out of that disorder orchestrates a harmony. In these days, we should wonder what the Spirit is trying to shake out, to prune away, so that in days to come we can first perceive, then act upon those divine impulses. The same Spirit prompts us to wonder who God wants us to be, so that we can wonder what our Church’s mission requires of us. These sentiments should shape our plans for re-emerging from the disruption and suffering during this pandemic.
And plan we must, both for the sake of order as well as charity. Each day brings new information, further consultation and more recommendations. As I mentioned in my last letter, I know people are hungry to get back into church. The decisions that I will make about Masses and sacraments are complex and I am thankful for your continued patience. I’m regularly consulting with the Indiana Catholic bishops, attending to federal and local state (Indiana) pronouncements, and weighing the advice of healthcare officials.
Our main concern remains the pastoral care for souls in our diocese. After consultation, we have decided to postpone our original Uniting in Heart clergy
transfer date that was scheduled for June 29, 2020. We don’t know what the next few weeks will bring but I would like to try to provide an opportunity for your parish families to see one another again, to celebrate the sacraments together and to have a proper send-off before our changes. With this in mind, Wednesday, August 19, 2020 will be the ‘moving day.’ Our retiring pastors have agreed to keep working until then. After this, they will be able to help periodically with supply work, while not assuming an official or unofficial status as an adjunct to any single pastorate.You might ask—”What if we encounter another surge in the COVID-19 infection rate and numbers as predicted for mid-August or September? Is the moving date firm?” Educated forecasts show that there will be another surge, we just don’t know when. For planning purposes, August 19, 2020 has to be a firm date.
Information about home sales indicates that people can and do move in the present environment.There are several reasons why it will be advisable to wait a bit longer than June 29, 2020, and there are reasons why we cannot further extend the time before assignment changes.
1. I understand longing each of you has to see your pastor and priests to say goodbye before the move. As the lockdown continues, we aren’t quite sure that we will be able to assemble in groups at the end of June. And for right now, assembling in any sizable groups to do any advance planning or facilities preparation is problematic. So, some delay is warranted.
2. I also acknowledge that our priests have the desire to celebrate the sacraments with the people they have been journeying with over the past weeks and months. While realizing limitations may fluctuate by the week or month, I hope this delay will allow enough time for the clergy to celebrate First Holy Communions, Baptisms, Confirmations, etc. with their parishioners.
3. Our retiring priests have agreed to stay at their posts for a while longer but it’s important to remember, they are staying on as a favor to us, and we don’t want to abuse the favor. I also do not want to wear them out. Most want to help out at parishes from time to time – they might be available for years if we don’t wear them out now.
4. Where parish schools are concerned, an August 19 move date allows present pastors to greet the school students on their (hoped for) return to classroom learning for the 2020-2021 school year (a blessing since they were not given the opportunity for a proper goodbye when the lockdown began). The longer we wait, the more burdensome the transition becomes between unfamiliar priests and school staff.
5. There have been many suggestions about the timing of moves and about the best week, month, or year. To be practical, that conversation cannot proceed indefinitely. And it is not a matter of one person being right and other wrong, it’s about the need for somebody to make a decision. That decision brings a bit of certainty into a historical moment where things actually are in constant motion. Waiting and delay are not free of costs– there is a cost in personnel, deferred maintenance, or in streaming resources into efforts that have little to do with the long-term vitality of the church of Lafayette-in-Indiana.
In the meantime, we have decided that ordinations will be moved to Saturday, August 1st at the Cathedral. The reason for this is two-fold; I want the men to be able to share this momentous occasion with their families and friends and current restrictions would limit our congregation (assembly) size. I also want our newly ordained to be able to go into ministry following their ordination and not have to shelter-in-place until current restrictions have let up. I realize that this short- circuits the summer ministry for transitional deacons, but it is a difficult time. One of our senior men reminded me of the abbreviated formation some men experienced during the Second World Wars [sic].
State recommendations about groups no larger than ten persons will continue to apply to Masses, infant baptisms, weddings and funerals. Social distancing remains a requirement of such gatherings, in addition to any sanitizing that needs to happen before and after a gathering. Where the small group gathering is not a chosen option, sacraments will be performed when re-opening is prudently possible (infant baptisms, weddings, funerals or Memorial Masses).
Additionally, I have asked a pastor to empanel seasoned pastors and a health professional to be a taskforce that will review guidelines for our parishes as we begin to ‘re-open’.
Please know that all of you remain in my prayers and your health and wellbeing is of utmost importance. I ask that each of you continue to pray for an end to this pandemic and that the Blessed Mother sustain us in our ministry. This Friday, May 1st, there will be a national re consecration to Mary, Mother of God. We seek her intercession and the kind attentions of Our Lord, Jesus.
In Christ’s peace,
Most Reverend Timothy Doherty Bishop of Lafayette-in-Indiana
Some initial thoughts on this development:
- Some aspects of the above seem commendable on the bishop’s part, while bearing in mind that the practical efficacy of the decision to delay relies upon the extent to which sacraments and liturgies are permitted before the new date in August.
- The bishop himself has noted that the UiH plan goes far beyond the plan for priestly assignments. Whether in June, August or later, there are developments coming that remain a concern. So while it is well to give thanks if the delay in clergy transfers is of spiritual help to your parish, it is also well to remain vigilant and to continue examining the proposed changes.
We urge our readers to take all these things to God this week, and to join in asking Our Lady’s particular help for our diocese this Friday.
31 Replies to “Diocesan Update”
Does anyone know if the Lafayette Diocese has applied for Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program money?
What saddens me so much about the Bishop’s stubbornness regarding moving forward with this plan this summer is that moving priests around during a time like this should be the last thing on all of our minds. We can’t go to church right now. We can’t even receive the sacraments. It could be several weeks still until we can go to Mass again. I’m not trying to be a downer but even when we are able to return to Mass I think we all know it will be very different than what we are used to in an effort to keep everyone safe and healthy. Churches won’t be able to be filled to capacity if we’re having to spread out between the pews to practice social distancing. We will likely be wearing masks during Mass and the communion procession is expected to be changed to accommodate regulations and suggestions from the health department and government officials. Many older people won’t even be able to attend at all!
These will be things we all have to adjust to together and changes that we have never before experienced. It doesn’t seem fair to our priests, who are having to figure out how they are going to implement all these changes and keep the faithful safe, to also be expected to change parishes during this time. It doesn’t seem fair to parishioners to have to lose the priests they are used to during such challenging times. It just seems like our priests are going through enough right now without also having to deal with this plan that many don’t even agree with.
Prayerfully consider the facts:
The Vicar General’s sister has NOT been an employee of the diocese since 2017. She has had no involvement with priest assignments at all. Who makes this up? Why make this up?
Our diocese is blessed that in an era of declining vocations, one family has given us 3 devoted priests. Where does hostility toward priests who are brothers come from? Have you encouraged a son or daughter to seek a religious vocation?
Why not see the good in people- especially those giving their lives to our Church? Why not work together? Why spread falsehoods? In reality, I see our diocese working hard to keep churches open for us, while addressing the priest shortage.
If we truly care about this diocese, please verify facts, pray, & do all things in a spirit of love.
We agree with this sentiment regarding the need to verify facts and endeavor to maintain charity in this discussion. We have at present no reason to think the individual mentioned has been involved in CPAC or diocesan employment during the UiH process, so her reputation should be respected.
Valid questions. Why would someone make this up? One theory is that someone has a personal grudge against the Vicar General or his family, for reasons we may only speculate about. Another is that this is a false flag and someone wishes to deliberately plant misinformation to derail legitimate discussions here. In any case, those who are interested in examining and questioning the United in Heart plan must always do so with charity and with facts that can be demonstrated. The calls for verification of the allegations regarding the Vicar General’s family were well founded and speak to the fair-mindedness of those following what is said here. Perhaps the diocese could shut down some of the speculation by more transparency about the reasons for the mass migration.
Is anyone else on here disturbed at calling Fr. Ted a villain? If not, that is very disturbing. Would you can him that to his face? Probably not.
I looked on the Amazing Parish website and saw that very reputable, and conservative teachers such as Jeff Cavins and Curtis Mitch and Sr. Regina Marie, OCD have spoken at their conference. In their banner you can clearly see a Dominican Sister, either a Nashville Dominican or a Dominican Sister of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist. I listened to several of the videos and heard nothing that smacks of heresy, Protestantism, or destroying parishes. Why exactly is the Amazing parish so bad? Are these good people (Cavins, Mitch, the Sisters) who are part of Amazing parish so very wrong and Red Wolf so right?
@Anonymous “In what company is it OK to hire a family member to aid in the implementation of your plan, and then preside over determining which priests go where, and then judge how they are doing so they can be demoted if they don’t follow the plan well enough.”
Take a look at the last names of the priests who were chosen to remain pastors.
The VG’s sister has already worked at each of her 3 priest brother’s parishes. When she worked at Blessed Sacrament her brother the pastor welcomed her with a full page in the bulletin as well as from
the pulpit. He never added that she is his sister. And the diocesan handbook added a nepotism rule about that same time …
Can we see some documentation of that? A link?
Hol up… what? What is her name? What is her official title? Is she a diocesan employee or a volunteer? What are her qualifications?
Sorry fellow missionary disciple, you’re running afoul of the first commandment of UiH: Thou shall not “…privately or publicly speak or act in opposition to the Uniting in Heart 2030 Plan.” Off to re-education camp with you!
I don’t think it runs afoul of anything to ask for some verification of an accusation of nepotism or conflict of interest, or abdication of responsibility by the bishop, or whatever the accusation is. There appear to be only two women on the Clergy Personnel Advisory Committee on which the Vicar General’s sister is supposed to sit. Here’s the link: https://dol-in.org/news/appoint-cpac
Neither of the two women appointed on Dec. 1, 2019 appears to be related to the Vicar General.
Here’s the problem as I’ve been reading these posts over the last weeks: our diocese leadership CANNOT be open with us who are affected by what is being called “passion-driven” ministry — whatever that means.
If the leadership was open, it would face the reality of MANYMANYMANY people and clergy who don’t want to be experimented on compliments of Lilly, the Partners group, etc.
PROPHECY/PREDICTION/FACT: The same bishop who cannot make a decision on his own about how/when to open churches, will not make a decision about UIH. That decision has been made for him, and those unseen ones will NEVER stop, NEVER admit they’ve made a huge MISTAKE, and don’t care if they money is cut off by us in the pews.
This is ideological. The unseen ones don’t care about the money. It’s all about power. It’s as if the bishop is being held in a tower somewhere, with his own agreement, as this all comes to pass. Where is he anyway?
I heard from people in our Faith Formation ministry that the priests are already being formed online by the unseen ones. Probably too scared to object to the notion that whatever they’ve been doing all the combined years of their ministry hasn’t been “passion driven.” They’re being forced to admit that THEY’VE BEEN THE PROBLEM all along and they need to be de-programmed/re-programmed.
This is bad stuff. Somebody’s pulling lots of strings…
You are being too kind.
We all know who really runs the diocese. The VG is basically Jafar, the Royal Vizier to the Sultan. His sister is on the CPAC (the committee that chose which priests went where) and had a large role in the priestly reassignments. And now, she has been promoted again and is in charge of monitoring the missionary pastors monthly and determining how well they are doing with implementing the plan. In what company is it OK to hire a family member to aid in the implementation of your plan, and then preside over determining which priests go where, and then judge how they are doing so they can be demoted if they don’t follow the plan well enough. It is a massive conflict of interest and it ensures the plan goes exactly how Jafar wants it to go. I pray that my Bishop sees how toxic this plan and his hierarchy is, and realizes he has the power to undo what has been decided for him, and not by him.
Amen!
Yes, nepotism at its finest. I’m glad this is finally out there. Thank you for having the guts to say it.
“Uniting in Nepotism”. Now that’s what I call thinking outside of the box, passion-driven ministry. What a racket!
Is anyone else on here disturbed at calling Fr. Ted a villain? If not, that is very disturbing. Would you can him that to his face? Probably not.
I looked on the Amazing Parish website and saw that very reputable, and conservative teachers such as Jeff Cavins and Curtis Mitch and Sr. Regina Marie, OCD have spoken at their conference. In their banner you can clearly see a Dominican Sister, either a Nashville Dominican or a Dominican Sister of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist. I listened to several of the videos and heard nothing that smacks of heresy, Protestantism, or destroying parishes. Why exactly is the Amazing parish so bad? Are these good people who are part of
Amazing parish so very wrong and Red Wolf so right?
Has anyone reported this to the Papal Nuncio or US Council of Catholic Bishops?
I checked. The Vicar General’s sister has a Master’s from Franciscan University Steubenville & a doctorate in theology. Well-qualified for any lay position she has had. However, she has NOT been employed by the diocese since 2017. No association with any CPAC committee. No association with any priest moves whatsoever.
Thank you for starting this site and keeping the updates coming.
I understand the need for our diocese to support and consolidate some of the smaller parishes, but how does the total disruption of our diocese serves any good purpose? If you are interested in making your concerns known, consider writing letters to the following:
Bishop Timothy L. Doherty, S.T.L, Ph.D.
610 Lingle Avenue
Lafayette, IN 47901
Papal Nuncio to the United States
The Most Reverend Christophe Pierre
Apostolic Nuncio to the United States
3339 Massachusetts Ave. N.W.
Washington, DC 20008-3610
President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
The Most Reverend Jose H. Gomez
3211 Fourth St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20017
It seems to me the diocese is now contractually obligated, via the grant, to implement UiH or face having to pay back a boatload of cash. If the diocese changed course now, they’d likely have to immediately initiate a new fundraising campaign called “United in Payback”. I can’t imagine there would be much enthusiasm for that campaign among the laity, do you?
I would contribute greatly to “Uniting in Payback” if it meant scrapping Uniting in Heart. Humility in the face of a mistake like Uniting in Heart would be commendable and ought to be supported.
I would much rather our diocese be financially bankrupt than spiritually and vocationally bankrupt.
I think, with as many people in the diocese as there are, it would be easy to raise 1 or even 2 million dollars to undo Uniting in Heart. The only thing that would deter people is: Can they trust the same leadership that brought on United in Heart with underhanded sleight-of-hand methods? The money would have to go directly to the entities demanding payback.
I would give more money to “United in Paycheck” than I ever will to “Uniting in Heart”. I would imagine they would raise whatever money they needed in record time. People. do. not. want. this. plan.
Yep, me too, here take my money for United in Payback. Gladly. What a concept: people paying money to keep their priest and not have the diocese reinvent the wheel.
My comment isn’t really about UIH but I wanted to post anyway. I recently grew quite discouraged about the lack of access to the sacraments and uncertainty over when they will become available again, especially since we were trying (unsuccessfully) to schedule our child’s baptism right as the restrictions went into place. This news comes as a consolation and answer to my prayers. Praise God.
Extending the transfers by six weeks is just throwing a bone to the people of the Diocese. We have absolutely no way of knowing if we will even have the Sacraments by the time that the new transfer date rolls around (it’s looking more and more like an impossibility after reading this update)- and the announcement does nothing more than make it seem like we are being heard. The dishonesty and secrecy that the Diocese has used from the start of the UiH plan, make me doubt every word that comes out of the office now. How sad.
Sacraments? What are those? I’ve got a TV now…