Programming the Parishes, Part 2

Programming the Parishes, Part 2

The second parish programming model in our diocese is Divine Renovation:  Bringing Your Parish from Maintenance to Mission.  

The movement was founded by Canadian priest Fr. James Mallon & inspired in part by Amazing Parish (Fr. Mallon was a guest speaker at an Amazing Parish conference early on). This model also aims to transform parish culture, which is defined by Fr. Mallon as “the things we presume, the things we celebrate, the things we tolerate, that we reward.”  Fr. Mallon published a book and held his first program conference in August of 2014.

Mallon argues in his book that parishes need to be outwardly mission-focused above all else, that they are not there “to celebrate good liturgy and to keep people happy,” that mission work constitutes their whole purpose, identity, and goal.

Like Amazing Parish, this is accomplished by building a small team of parish leaders and training them to run the parish alongside their “missionary pastor.” Fr. Mallon favors the use of Alpha, an adaptation of a non-Catholic formation & charismatic prayer program with the goal of increasing participation in evangelization.

You can read about Divine Renovation on its official site here. The program is currently in use in the Archdiocese of Chicago as part of the Renew My Church plan.

Vision & Leadership Groups

According to Fr. Mallon, the plan requires a small group of leaders who collectively “share a vision,” and direct all those not in the group toward said vision.   He largely follows Lencioni’s team model here.

Fr. Mallon speaks about relying on character-based servant leadership rather than positional authority, but also thinks that no disagreement can be allowed in the core group about its vision. The enforcement of this, one assumes, must fall back on some use of positional authority in the end. After all, somebody has to be the one to decide who gets to be in the leadership group and whether that person shares the vision adequately.

Mallon states:

“A leadership team is four or five people . . . . there has to be total commitment to the vision, you gotta be committed,  in total agreement about where you’re going, where you’re headed.   That includes fidelity to the teachings of the Church and all this, but even within the parish, our vision, the thing that makes us passionate, you’ve gotta have people of the same passion.  And you can’t tolerate disagreement on that….”  

Fr. Mallon says it’s okay to talk things out, and wants people to be unafraid to do so, but discussion isn’t about the vision, only the best means by which to reach it.   Leaders are those who follow the vision and the plan.

“The Kingdom of God is Like Unto a Photocopier...”

The second thing to know about the Divine Renovation model is that Fr. Mallon’s vision for parish health & vibrancy is “the photocopier model of Church.” Hence the focus on becoming outwardly mission-oriented:

“The Church is like a photocopier.   A photocopier brings paper in, processes it, and spits it out to make a difference in the world.  ‘Bringing in’ is evangelizing. ‘Processing’ is discipling [sic]. And printing and stapling and sending the paper out is sending the people out on mission.  When you see parishes that are actually doing this, you say, ‘Okay, what do they have in common?’ What’s important to these parishes? Not just what they say is important, what do their actions–what do they do, how they spend their money–show what they value?”

In his book, Fr. Mallon considers those not involved in this type of work to have failed in the spiritual maturity to which Scripture calls them:

“It would not be “cute” for a parent to come home and find their 25-year old son, in his mind sitting on the couch sucking on his thumb. Why, then do we have such tolerance for lifelong parishioners who are stuck in such a place spiritually?”

So, it would seem that parishioners who don’t participate in the new initiatives can be added to the list of things that are not to be “tolerated” in this model.

Just like in Amazing Parish, one of the ways to keep the photocopier going is to change up the environment of Mass and other liturgies. 

Fr. Mallon advocates for funding and providing a heavily-curated weekend experience for the Mass-goer, even if this requires parish monies to be siphoned away from other things, such as children’s’ catechesis.  He voiced his own regrets about not disposing of his parish DRE earlier so that the money spent on the kiddies’ CCD could be put into creating more exciting liturgies with bands and contemporary music. If there is a market for traditional liturgy, that can be offered as well, to cater to all tastes.  His own parish (St. Benedict’s, Nova Scotia) hired a lay person in the position of “homily support” so that homilies could be pre-fabricated to be more dynamic and ‘relevant’ than what Father himself might be able to come up with on a given Sunday.

Mission Activity and Sacraments:   What Runs the Copier?

The aim of the plan overall seems to be a form of religious productivity. Sacramental encounters with God appear to be valuable insofar as they become a means to the religious productivity.   This is why, historically, we’re more likely to find this photocopier model, with its emphasis on active recruiting methods, in Protestant churches than in Catholic parishes. Again, it’s a megachurch strategy, with roots in the Protestant “Missio Dei” theology from the 1950s and the evangelical Missional Church Movement that sprung up later.

The emphasis on the primacy of recruitment activity also leads Fr. Mallon to make some interesting comments on the sacraments themselves:    

“What is a valid sacrament if there is no fruitfulness?  These are theological categories, these are ontological, you know, medieval, scholastic categories of thought that really are abstractions.  Like, in the end, if a sacrament isn’t changing your life–this is almost heretical–who cares if it’s valid?   It makes no difference.” 

Fr. James Mallon

We are certain Fr. Mallon has his own reverence for the sacraments, but this statement seems to place the value of a sacrament on whether your life is changed in the ways he (or the Missional Church philosophy) considers important.

Are sacraments valid or relevant only when your parish is increasing, either in numbers or in whatever metric of “vitality” a program model might supply? While we concur that evangelization is key to the Christian mission, and that all must follow Our Lord’s mandate to share the Gospel, it is not clear that this is a numbers game, much less a mechanistic process like a copier spitting out pages, nor that the spiritual maturity, moral goodness, or tolerability of one’s parishioners ought to be gauged in their rate of participation in one’s programs and initiatives.

At any rate, the model has been implemented in our diocese at The Church of the Blessed Sacrament Parish in West Lafayette.  There, parish changes included the installation of new technology, including large video screens to enhance the Sunday liturgy experience.   (Fr. Mallon’s original parish in Nova Scotia also boasts such a technology array in the sanctuary.)

So again, this raises some questions that we hope our diocesan leaders will answer:

1. If such programming models are built into UiH in some way, that means the laity are in some sense about to become the subjects of a rather large social experiment, aimed at replacing their current spiritual culture with a new one which is about 6 years old, has non-Catholic roots, and is sold on the internet.  Is this the case?  

2.  Are we going to be asked to adapt the parish architecture in our church sanctuaries to reflect the ideology of these models?   To expend great sums of money on things like projection screens?   To eliminate staff positions or education funding or parish customs, the better to finance or concentrate on such undertakings?     

3.  Finally, and most importantly:  Do we really, really believe that our Church, the Bride of Jesus Christ, cannot fulfill her mission without our being brought under the ethos of the commercial parish program model?   

Though our diocese has not directly said that the Uniting in Heart 2030 Pastoral Plan has consulted, been influenced by, or intends to include models like Amazing Parish or Divine Renovation, the similarity in language and concept is noteworthy, as is the manifest interest in these models by our diocesan decision-makers. It will be interesting to see if there is an attempt to replicate something close to these models across the diocese.   

All quotations from Fr. Mallon were taken from his 5-part interview series unless otherwise specified. You can view the series at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQjXZBNQbWBzH7EScMDwaMA


43 Replies to “Programming the Parishes, Part 2”

  1. @Sad Catholic: Many good pastors didn’t step down to become associates. Good pastors were forced to become associates because the number of pastors was reduced as part of the plan.

    3
  2. Isn’t negativity and despair of the devil? He is certainly happy about it! He must be happy about all the Everyone seems to think the parishes and the diocese were perfect before this plan began. Everyone was perfectly and correctly catechized. Every Catholic family was attending Mass every Sunday. No parents were simply dropping their kids off to class, bypassing Mass. Parents were not struggling with teens who weren’t going to Mass. Catholic marriages were strong, no divorce. Parishes all got along with each other. Priests all got along with each other. No one was every greeted with “oh, so you finally decided to go to REAL Catholic parish” or had the experience of parishes thinking they were better than other parishes. Everything was going along swimmingly until someone came up with this plan. I am NOT saying that this UIH is perfect. I wish there was no need for the secrecy that everyone here keeps talking about. But no priest, bishop, parishioner, plan or it’s execution is perfect. It seems that the plan is going to happen. Priests are going to new parishes and they will take care of a new flock. They will survive because we, the laity are good people. Some act like these new assignments are a death sentence. Gosh, thank you for that. So what if everyone takes a breath, prays, and has some hope in the Good God that He will bring the good He intends for all of us. Demonizing anyone is wrong and there has been quite a bit of demonizing on this website. The BEST part of this website has been the call to prayer for the bishop and the priests. Let’s do that. Let’s pray, welcome our new pastors, and work to build up our faith and the Body of Christ.

    1. Wondering, you’d have to clarify what you mean in your first question. While despair is a theologically defined term and is certainly of the devil, “negativity” is a squishy, new-age term. Your usage suggests you mean “saying things someone doesn’t like.” If that’s the case, that’s not of the devil- it’s just criticism that perhaps you don’t agree with. I dare not speculate how the devil feels about the legitimate concerns of those writing and commenting here, but it certainly seems to be annoying the bishop and his yes-men.

      I’m curious which post or comment has left you with the idea that “everyone seems to think the parishes and the diocese were perfect before the plan began.” I don’t think there are any such posts, and you’re both avoiding the issue and setting up a straw man. In fact, NOBODY here has suggested everything with parishes and the diocese was perfect. We’re simply offering legitimate criticism of this plan, its origins, its theology, its execution, and its likely effects.

      I certainly agree with you that the laity are good people (mostly.) But survival isn’t contingent on goodness, as you suggest. Physical survival depends on action. Spiritual survival requires action as well, and sometimes that requires resisting something that is bad. Do you think that priests and bishops never do anything bad? Do you think priests and bishops never enact policies or schemes to cover up bad things? Do you think that dioceses have never enacted disastrous plans before, or instituted schemes that scarred innocent people and deeply wounded the faith of their flock? Do you think they’ve never sheared their sheep and frittered away money before? Do you think they’ve never used secrecy, fear and obfuscation before?

      We have the right to make our needs and desires known. We have a right to criticize those who harm the Church, whether they are laity, priest or prelate. We have an obligation to issue fraternal correction and speak up against abuses.

      20
      1. I thought this was a forum for our thoughts and ideas. I thought it would be a place where differing views were respected. But it is not.

    2. No one here is saying that problems did not exist before the UiH plan announcement. Not a few of us have seen real problems for decades. But what we are saying here, what we are expressing is UiH is the opposite of a solution. If one believes this and one loves the Church, he ought to resist it.

      As far as praying, yes pray. But we are also called to action.

      “Pray as though everything depended on God. Work as though everything depended on you.” -St. Augustine

      “Act and God will act.” -St. Joan of Arc

      16
      1. Wondering declares: “Priests are going to new parishes and they will take care of a new flock. They will survive because we, the laity are good people.”

        Too bad the priests had no input about it from what we’re hearing.

        Too bad the same system of silence, obedience, and demand that we think of the greater good instead of each individual as important — a system used so effectively by the Church of McCarrick, is still being used as a stick.

        The poor priests: “Priests are going to new parishes and they will take care of a new flock. They will survive…”.

        Yeah…that’ll generate lots of new vocations.

        4
        1. Exactly, PM. From an inside perspective I can tell you that pastors had no say in this whatsoever. I have not heard from a single priest, outside of those on the Uniting in Heart team, that is on board with his plan. Even priests that have served in this diocese for decades have tried to have an honest discourse with the Bishop regarding the many ways in which Uniting in Heart could be incredibly detrimental to many. He cannot be swayed. There is fear that some priests will likely leave the diocese. People have every right to be concerned and to want answers. If you’re not worried you don’t understand the level of destruction that is going on.

          7
          1. I understand that a number of priests are retiring as a result of this and some pastors have stepped down to become associates again.

            1
    3. Understanding and bringing light to what is happening is very much an integral part of our lives. Ignoring the fact that these things are taking place is like walking around in a house on fire. Prayer, fasting and works of Mercy are the true keys to healing this diocese and more. Not rock and roll music, drums, video screens and comedy shows before Mass begins. I have seen all of this happen at Blessed Sacrament in West Lafayette and I as well as many other families did not and do not approve. I have also been made aware that the Pastor who has introduced this “Amazing Parish” program to Blessed Sacrament in West Lafayette brought forth his opinion during one Sunday sermon that those whom have left his parish “Weren’t Catholic”. I find it VERY hard to believe that comments like those come from any better place and I also find it very difficult to stomach that type of behavior from a Priest during the Celebration of the Holy Mass. Please don’t give me your higher than mighty bologna. Taking Christ out of the focus is the problem in our faith today and it has been happening for many years. Just as things started to turn around in this area, here comes Uniting in Heart and Amazing Parish to begin the destruction of what has been built by Eucharistic Adoration, prayer and Fasting.

      1
  3. This discussion has been great to read and hear so many valid points.

    A few comments:
    1. After the gospel is read during mass, we say: “Praise to you Lord Jesus Christ” acknowledging that Christ speaks to us in the reading or Scripture. I think it important to acknowledge and respect the faith of our Protestant brothers and sisters whose emphasis tends to be the Word of God whereas we Catholics tend to emphasize the sacramental dimension of the Church. My preferred style is of course Catholic and more centrally Trappist Catholic.
    2. Judas was an apostle who God choose, who spent 3 years with Christ hearing his words, seeing his miracles, etc. Perhaps we should not a priori assume that the clergy are holy.
    3. Diverting varying portions of parish contributions away from the local parishes (what part do we play in how the money is spent anyway) and into other local charities would send a strong wake up call to those in governance of our diocese. One hopes that those in governance would hear the message.
    4. A Trappist monk told me that the only “action” we completely own is our sins; all else is done in cooperation with God’s grace. In addition to the many points and suggestions made in this blog, let us continually pray for those in governance of the diocese that they may hear the “sensus fidelium” (us), incorporate the many excellent points, and be empowered by the Holy Spirit to truly serve the laity now and in the future. God is not deaf and will respond to our prayers as God always does (according to His fashion) so that the diocese can rise from the rubble that may pile up as a result of (not) UiH.

    7
    1. Great points: Money talks and prayers for the bishop and clergy are essential at this time. We must respect the dignity of their respective positions in the Church established by Christ even if some of them don’t seem deserving of it. In the end, they are merely temporary occupants of the offices they hold here on earth, and whether they’ve fulfilled the duties of their offices or abused them is not for us to judge. The Just Judge will hold each of them accountable at their own personal judgments at the end of their lives. So do we just silently “take it” or abandon ship when we see unjust things happen in our local church? Of course not. This Red Wolf blog is evidence that there are faithful Catholics out there that will not be so easily ready to throw in the towel and become protestant or join rebel sects like the SSPX who are not in communion with Rome and are all too ready to poach faithful Catholics who are. A brave soldier doesn’t leave the battlefield because it gets hard. Likewise, a faithful Catholic never leaves the Church but instead fights for her restoration and exultation. She’s worth it, plus we already have the consolation of knowing Christ’s victory on the cross. So how do we fight? We follow the precepts of the church (and direct our tithe to worthy recipients), we work out our own salvation in fear and trembling, we grow in love and knowledge of our faith, and we pray unceasingly. Deuteronomy 31:6

      7
      1. A lot of us saw the Twitter and other social media hissyfit/slapfest over Easter Weekend between various Catholic bloggers, writers, commentators, etc. about the SSPX. It was very demoralizing, and I hope it doesn’t spill over into this generally productive space. We certainly aren’t going to resolve that infight that has been 50+ years in the making, nor do I think that should be our goal. Without getting caught in the quagmire of that particular debate, I think we can acknowledge that some, perhaps many, will be driven to look for other options.

        3
      2. How do we fight? Maybe we need to look at the teachers from Indiana as an example. Decisions were already in place about pay being based on standardized testing results, about how teachers need to put in additional hours in the community. Really? How was change brought about after it had already been decided at the state level regarding what makes a school/teacher effective? It took a rally with around 30,000 teachers to say we are NOT going to submit ourselves to these decisions about our pay, our livelihood. Maybe we, as Catholics, should see these teachers as examples. The voices of a few will not change the decisions of the “leaders”, but the voices of many can and will.
        I am a Catholic through and through, but the fact that we have had no voice in the direction of OUR CHURCH, is unacceptable. The church is me; the church is you; the church is not just the cleric. We have a right to know what is going on BEFORE it is decided what is going to happen. All of the articles in the Catholic Moment to keep us informed were basically to say this is what we are going to do, so deal with it. Really????? Thank you very much, and the fact that the UIH committee chose people who they knew who would agree with them is intentional. I love my faith, its sacramental basis, but I do not like being taken advantage of because of my love of Catholicism. And the fact that this UIH has created such a massive change in parishes, priests, approach, is difficult to deal with. Why did the bishop and parochial vicar have to go at the change with such force and decisiveness? Isn’t change more accepted in baby steps? Why the need for this mass upheaval in priest reassignments, parish affiliations? Every church has its own dynamics, its own climate. Where is that consideration in this UIH? The “church” is US, not the cleric, or the people with prestige or honor. Why do we have so many good priests retiring? Why do we have so many teachers saying, “I don’t want to deal with this anymore?” There seems to be a correlation here.
        This website is our voice, but it also needs to be our action!!

        20
        1. My wife and I have cancelled our future payments to Fruitful Harvest now. Gives me a real sense of peace. Come Holy Spirit (& not just at Geist)!

          14
    1. I live around the corner from a Presbyterian church, and I must say, the genuine friendliness of the people that work and pray there exceeds most of my experiences with the local Catholic parishes. They seem to be living their faith in the way they treat others, even strangers. This to me, is evangelization. Having more programs as an attempt to draw people to a parish is actually doing the opposite of what evangelization is meant to do. It is pushing people away from the parish. I don’t know about any of the rest of the respondents here, but I am not into propaganda whose aim it is to sell one parish over another or to sell programs like UIH. This is not our mission as Christians.
      Shouldn’t the mission of any parish be to serve its congregation and to promote their spiritual growth? Do big projectors promote spirituality? What does promote spirituality? Leaders who provide real opportunities, not sales tactics, to their parishioners. This couldn’t be more evident than now when looking at what St. Tom’s is doing versus any other parish during this corona virus pandemic. What parish is providing daily adoration? What other parish is streaming daily masses? The care and concern is obvious and felt. That is a mission being realized and lived out.

      8
  4. When our church (in the Lafayette diocese) moved to implement Alpha I expressed serious misgivings about its Catholicity to our pastor, and as I was part of the youth formation pastoral council I thought I would at least have some input and start a discussion about why we would be using a Protestant program to catechize and evangelize youth. But it was a fait accompli, as so many directives from the diocese are.

    I have studied the Alpha program by actually reviewing the materials and watching the videos. If Alpha and things like it are part of the model the diocese wants to move toward, then it seems clear that we are to shed not only our unique identities as parishes, but our identities as Catholics as well. Alpha is THOROUGHLY PROTESTANT in both theology and style.

    But don’t take my word for it- here’s what Cardinal Raymond Burke had to say about Alpha:
    “Having studied the program (ALPHA), both from the perspective of doctrine and methodology, I must make it clear that the program may not be used, in any form…While, like so many similar programs, ALPHA may seem to offer a more attractive and effective form of evangelization and catechesis, it does not have the doctrinal and methodological foundations required for the teaching of the Catholic Faith.”

    There’s a lot more about it, if you’re interested…. And faithful Catholics should be.
    Sources: https://creamcitycatholic.com/2017/09/12/alpha-not-catholic/?v=7516fd43adaa#comments
    https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=7562
    https://www.churchmilitant.com/main/generic/faq-alpha (lots here)

    16
    1. Unfortunately, publishing a link to the extremist and revolting “church militant” discredits a good discussion. The sole purpose Church Militant is to create division, confusion, and conflict within the Church. Actions of that nature run contrary to Christian tradition. Its website is not to be taken seriously.

      1
  5. Now wait a minute how does this work?

    “His own parish (St. Benedict’s, Nova Scotia) hired a lay person in the position of “homily support” so that homilies could be pre-fabricated to be more dynamic and ‘relevant’ than what Father himself might be able to come up with on a given Sunday.”

    Prefabricated to be more dynamic….that dog don’t hunt!!

    and the relevant Question# 3…

    “3. Finally, and most importantly: Do we really, really believe that our Church, the Bride of Jesus Christ, cannot fulfill her mission without our being brought under the ethos of the commercial parish program model? ”

    When I see the Church trying to imitate business models, I cannot help but think
    why are you trying to serve God and mammon…. or at least trying to serve God LIKE He is mammon?

    12
  6. Buuuuut why stop there? Let’s have the priest slide down a rope from the rafters after the processional hymn to start Mass, in the style of the Philly Phanatic! We can suspend the priest by a cable and lift him out over the congregation so he can crowd surf! Laserlight show? You got it! Be sure to make a TikTok of yourself receiving communion before going to reconciliation via SnapChat! Can’t you just see St. Therese of Lisieux boogieying down at one of these “ Come to Jesus” experiences?
    No? Well, maybe it’s because the Catholic Mass isn’t a fad. The examples of Rebuilt, Amazing Parish, Divine Renovation, and Alpha are desperate, shallow, and embarrassing. It’s like telling St. Elmo’s Steakhouse that they need to be poised to compete with White Castle. WE need to model our parishes after the mega-churches??? Get this Joel Osteen crap out of my face.
    I watched the video of the “Mass” in the first post. It was gutting. I have NEVER seen a Catholic church like this and cannot believe a diocese would approve something like it, let alone build it up as the model that others should strive for. Notice the generic name of the Church: “Church of the Nativity.” After all, if we named the church after a patron saint, it might sound too Catholic and scare away protestants. This is already happening in our diocese with the re-naming of the Catholic hospitals to simply “Franciscan.”
    Which brings me back to my first point: these attempts are merely cloying tactics to try to get mega-church “customers” to try our “hamburgers” for a change. Is this what the “New Evangelization” is all about? Trying to steal business from bigger churches? I thought Evangelizing meant trying to get souls to Heaven, which means reaching the lukewarm, non-believers, and those who have not heard the Good Word. Honestly, I’m not too concerned about the souls of those who go to the mega-churches. I may disagree with their liturgy and esthetics, but they seem to already know their Bibles better than I do.
    We go to Catholic churches because we don’t like mega churches. We want Eucharistic processions. We want relics in our cathedrals. If you want to look at a diocese that is doing it right, look no further than our neighboring diocese to the east: Mercer County, OH. Did you consult their services before dropping stacks of cash to these businessmen? Mercer County is not a wealthy area. It is a simple farming community with some of the most beautiful churches in the United States. The churches are open nearly all hours of the day for people to visit, pray, and contemplate. The area is so Catholic you can’t avoid it (just look at the blue rosary lights hanging in the windows of many of homes in the area). Little country churches that are a stone’s throw from each other. Thousands of relics. Devotions to the saints. The people there are devout, love their sacraments, and care for their churches. They are weathering this storm quite well, even in an area that has been hit by the meth epidemic. Consultation from this diocese likely would have cost minimal. Did you ask them how they are doing it? Were you even aware it existed?
    Some people are asking great questions about Blessed Sacrament Parish in West Lafayette. I have it on good authority as well that there has been a mass exodus from this parish to St. Tom’s in recent years. Now, I have to applaud them for bringing the tabernacle back into the center of the alter and providing perpetual adoration. However, recent trends of adult women altar servers, praise and worship masses, and the much-maligned projector screens have clearly driven away many families from this parish. One need to look no further than the recent Fruitful Harvest reports. St. Tom’s in WL has a higher goal than Blessed Sacrament, and has paid off 100% of their goal much quicker than Blessed Sacrament. Ironically, it seems that the parishioners of Blessed Sacrament are not supportive of the goals of the diocese. These donations speak loudly, and I will certainly never give a dime to Fruitful Harvest as long as UiH is in place.
    There has been a lot of negativity directed to the bishop and certain members of the clergy in these comments. I want to remind people that they are holy men who have given their lives to God. They will certainly reach Heaven easier than I will. Yet, we all make mistakes at work. I have certainly caused my share of blunders at my job. A mistake is not (necessarily) a sin. But the men behind the UiH campaign, hear this: you are making a massive mistake. Come on. This plan has been a colossal failure so far. Save face and end this now before more permanent damage is done. All will be forgiven, and we can all forget that it ever happened in the first place. You even have the perfect excuse with COVID19. Here, I’ll write the press release for you: “With the recent Coronavirus outbreak, plans for the Uniting in Heart campaign will be suspended while the diocese reassess the re-opening of our parishes and the timeline for the continuation of sacraments.”
    Our Lady, Undoer of Knots, pray for us.

    27
  7. These last two articles finally fit the pieces of the puzzle together! Thank you.

    THIS is why the parish has to budget “$10-15K” extra a year for participation in UiH.

    THIS is why all the secrecy and the enforced silence.

    THIS is why the diocese employees and transition teams have been told not to read this blog.

    THIS is what’s coming and our leaders didn’t want us to see and know.

    So terribly sad and tragic and all in the name of the Holy Spirit.

    Carmel/Westfield lay leadership…may I humbly suggest a breakfast at a well-worn nook, when the restrictions lift? We need a financial/spiritual/liturgical plan asap…

    God bless all this Divine Mercy Sunday!

    19
    1. As a member of lay leadership in Anderson, I’ll be reaching out to others too. This is a disaster and losing Msgr we need a plan. Do we all remember the desolation before Msgr?! They’re coming back…with all the horrors outlined in this post.

      13
    2. The only financial plan that will matter is if any and all Fruitful Harvest donations cease immediately. A “business” can’t run without capital. So, if they want to treat the plan like a business, let’s talk with money.

      8
  8. If I’m not mistaken, wasn’t the tabernacle also moved back to the center at Blessed Sacrament around the same time the screens were installed? When I first set foot in that parish (ca. 2010) it was somewhere off in a side chapel.

    2
    1. “What is a valid sacrament if there is no fruitfulness? These are theological categories, these are ontological, you know, medieval, scholastic categories of thought that really are abstractions. Like, in the end, if a sacrament isn’t changing your life–this is almost heretical–who cares if it’s valid? It makes no difference.”

      Do we need to read any further than this? We should remove ourselves from ANYTHING that has to do with this program and its vision.

      8
    2. Speaking of that relocated tabernacle, I noticed in the parish website’s photo albums that the tabernacle is emptied during “praise & worship” events because the band takes over the sanctuary. I’m sorry, but when Jesus has to leave the room for a prayer meeting you know there’s a problem.

      9
      1. I think that they may be trying to follow the directive of the Congregation for Divine Worship regarding non-liturgical music in church. I’m not aware if our bishop has given directives such as listed therein, but I hope he has. According to that, the bishop may order that:
        f. The Blessed Sacrament should be, as far as possible, reserved in a side chapel or in another safe and suitably adorned place (Cf. C.I.C., can 928, par. 4).

        https://adoremus.org/2007/12/31/concerts-in-churches/

        Sadly, the directive referenced above was written with organ concerts and sacred polyphony in mind. However, in the desire to keep up with Protestant rock concerts, some churches have driven a truck through the small hole created here.

        Such concerts are entirely consistent with the overall ethos of protestantization… like the big projection screens and Powerpoint slideshows during the Holy Sacrifice. (Oh, I’m sorry…. I meant The Mass Experience.) Constantly trying to keep up with the new fads betrays an underlying lack of confidence in the ACTUAL things that set the Catholic church apart.

        6
    3. It appears to me that whoever is making these decisions at Blessed Sacrament is making them all with the purpose of disguise. Trading one good for many bad under the disguise of the good.

  9. I would be interested to know the numbers at Blessed Sacrament. I have several friends who abandoned that ship the second the large projector screens went up. My understanding is that hundreds of people left the parish….. is this what Fr. Ted and the Bishop are trying to do? Keep the catholics that do what you say and act how you act? Push the Catholics out who disagree? How is that missionary discipleship?!?! And where will people go if every parish in the diocese is supposed to end up like Blessed Sacrament?!

    15
    1. Every malicious revolution requires a purge, sometimes several purges. United in Heart will kick off its revolution with the priest transfers, purging the bonds many of the faithful have with their priests and ending years (sometimes decades) of authentic, Catholic culture. This “parish programming” business sounds like round two of the revolution. It’s doubtful the Blessed Sacrament experiment could be exported evenly across the diocese without eventually running out of other peoples’ money (paid shills aren’t cheap). Honestly though, if Holy Mother Church can survive scandals, persecution, faithless clergy, brain-dead laity, the spirit of Vatican II, and still manage to rescue a poor sinner like me, then truly the Bridegroom is in charge. You might have to drive a little further to mass, but Jesus is worth it. The faithful will survive this revolution too. Matthew 16:18

      7
    2. Exactly how I feel about them moving Father Tim Alkire away from St. Boniface and Msgr. Sell from Anderson, giving neither of them a Parish to Shepard. Wonder why that happened????

      2
  10. If this is where we are headed, the money from a large segment of the Catholic population will dry up. The youngsters they are trying to attract have no money. Making our parishes mirror the Protestant mega churches won’t work here in Lafayette. UIH is already starting from a deep hole, given this coronavirus lockdown of parishes. I would imagine the last phase of Fruitful Harvest will be a disaster. God help us if what you write is true.

    10
  11. This is explosive. I want to cheer R.W. for the work here, but I am too busy catching my breath from the gut punch. I thought UIH was simply about a controlled demolition… some parish closings according to a corporate downsizing model. If Blessed Sacrament is the model… this is much, much worse.

    17
  12. This would be a DISASTER! Since the leadership has shrouded UiH in secrecy and commanded uniformity “in public or private,” these posts might well be prophetic! There must be answers now.

    9

Leave a Reply

GUIDELINES FOR POSTING

1. No personal attacks against other posters.
2. No spamming comments.
3. Restrict comments to the topic of the post.
4. Pray, then post, as discussed before.

Your email address will not be published.